linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/15] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:33:01 +0900
From:	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/15] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:22:36 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On 06/08/2011 11:47 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> 
> >>> Sure, KVM guest is the client, and it uses e1000 NIC, and uses NAT
> >>> network connect to the netperf server, the bandwidth of our network
> >>> is 100M.
> >>>
> > 
> > I see the reason, thank you!
> > 
> > I used virtio-net and you used e1000.
> > You are using e1000 to see the MMIO performance change, right?
> > 
> 
> Hi Takuya,
> 
> Now, i have done the performance test for virtio-net, the performance is
> improved very little, and it is not *regression* ;-)
> 
> The reason is, MMIO generated by virtio-net is very very little.
> 

Yes, so I thought you had chosen e1000 for this test :)

Thanks,
  Takuya

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/