[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110608091120.GI27166@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:11:20 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: pageexec@...email.hu
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>,
x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@...labs.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] x86-64: Emulate legacy vsyscalls
There's clear evidence that any kind of exception in gettimeofday()/time()
is too slow. A few years ago gtod() had CPUID which lead to intercepts
with many hypervisors. This turned out to be a unacceptable slowdown,
so it was fixed,
A pagefault is a bit faster than a virtualization intercept, but not
much and therefore too slow.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists