lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:23:59 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Dynamic patching in discarded sections

I've been playing with randconfig builds and found an interesting problem
with the combination of:

CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT=y
CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n
CONFIG_DMABOUNCE=n
CONFIG_MMC_SPI=y

The problem is shown with this code:

static int __devexit mmc_spi_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
{
	...   
                        dma_unmap_single(host->dma_dev, host->ones_dma,
                                MMC_SPI_BLOCKSIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
                        dma_unmap_single(host->dma_dev, host->data_dma,
                                sizeof(*host->data), DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
	...
}

and the error message (in case someone looks for this using google) is

`.devexit.text' referenced in section `.pv_table' of drivers/built-in.o: defined in discarded section `.devexit.text' of drivers/built-in.o
`.devexit.text' referenced in section `.pv_table' of drivers/built-in.o: defined in discarded section `.devexit.text' of drivers/built-in.o

What happens is that dma_unmap_single() calls
 __dma_single_dev_to_cpu(dma_to_virt(dev, handle), size, dir), which requires
patching in the caller. However, due to CONFIG_HOTPLUG being disabled, the
__devexit section gets discarded, and the linker cannot create an entry in the
.pvtable section for the mmc_spi_remove function.

I don't know if the same problem exists in other places in the code, but it's
entirely possible. I also couldn't think of a good solution for this, short of
moving the definition of dma_unmap_single() to out of line code.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ