[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1307555315-30989-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:48:31 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Make sleep inside atomic detection work on !PREEMPT
Aside it may mostly avoid the need for a specific PROVE_RCU
check when we sleep inside an rcu read side critical section.
Better make sleeping inside atomic sections work everywhere.
Frederic Weisbecker (4):
sched: Remove pointless in_atomic() definition check
sched: Isolate preempt counting in its own config option
sched: Make sleeping inside spinlock detection working in
!CONFIG_PREEMPT
sched: Generalize sleep inside spinlock detection
Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl | 2 +-
Documentation/SubmitChecklist | 2 +-
Documentation/development-process/4.Coding | 2 +-
Documentation/ja_JP/SubmitChecklist | 2 +-
Documentation/zh_CN/SubmitChecklist | 2 +-
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 2 +-
include/linux/hardirq.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
include/linux/pagemap.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/preempt.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 12 ++++++------
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 3 +++
kernel/sched.c | 6 ++----
lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 ++++++---
15 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists