lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:00:24 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: use KERNEL_DS when trying to start init process

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I tried to work out how that set_fs() got there, in the historical git
> tree but it's part of 14592fa9:
>
>        73 files changed, 963 insertions(+), 798 deletions(-)
>
> which is pretty useless (what's up with that?)

Use tglx's more complete linux-history tree:

    http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git;a=summary

instead of the bkcvs import tree.

That said, that commit (it's commit ID 4095b99c09e3d in tglx's tree)
predates the "real" BK history too: it's part of the (limited) 2.4.x
history that was imported from the release patches into BK at the
beginning of the use of BK. So at that point we didn't do indivual
commits, it's just the import of the v2.4.3.7 -> v2.4.3.8 patch.

But yeah, it's old and crufty. And I agree that usually the correct
fix is to remove the set_fs() calls entirely.

                            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ