[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1106082252300.11814@ionos>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:54:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arne Jansen <lists@...-jansens.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de,
npiggin@...nel.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
frank.rowand@...sony.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [debug patch] printk: Add a printk killswitch to robustify NMI
watchdog messages
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 12:27 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Make some kind of
> >
> > void atomic_down();
> > int atomic_down_trylock();
> > void atomic_up();
>
> atomic_down() is a tad iffy, it would have to wait for an actual
> semaphore owner, which might sleep etc.. So I skipped it.
>
> The other two are implemented here, and assume IRQs are disabled, we
> could add _irq and _irqsave versions of both, but since there are no
> users I avoided the effort.
>
> ---
> include/linux/semaphore.h | 3 +++
> kernel/semaphore.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
Can we please confine this to kernel/printk.c ?
I can see the creative abuse of this already.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists