[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8yamxhsklhd.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:27:10 -0700
From: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, stepanm@...eaurora.org
Cc: Joerg Roedel <Joerg.Roedel@....com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] msm: iommu: move to drivers/iommu/
On Wed, Jun 08 2011, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> This should ease finding similarities with different platforms,
> with the intention of solving problems once in a generic framework
> which everyone can use.
>
> Compile-tested for MSM8X60.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig | 12 ------------
> arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/Makefile | 1 +
> .../mach-msm/iommu.c => drivers/iommu/msm-iommu.c | 0
> 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> rename arch/arm/mach-msm/iommu.c => drivers/iommu/msm-iommu.c (100%)
Moving the driver is good. I'm wondering what we should do with
iommu_dev.c, though. Wouldn't it make sense to move this file as well?
I've added the author, Stepan Moskovchenko, in case he has any feedback.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists