linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.39.1 immediately reboots/resets on EFI system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:57:25 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Jim Bos <jim876@...all.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39.1 immediately reboots/resets on EFI system

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> However, I suspect that what we *should* do is carry an kernel EFI stub
> to go along with the BIOS stub... otherwise we're forever at mercy of
> getting all the boot loader authors to change in lockstep, and there are
> specific ones which are notoriously hard to work with.

Yes, that would probably be a good approach. We obviously have some
low-level asm code for the BIOS case that is technically linked into
the kernel, but is running before the kernel boots and not really
"part" of the kernel. Doing something similar for EFI support sounds
entirely sane to me.

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/