linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: emaclite: Add missing linux/interrupt.h header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	monstr@...str.eu
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: emaclite: Add missing linux/interrupt.h header

From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Date: Thu,  9 Jun 2011 10:15:33 +0200

> Log:
> drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c: In function 'xemaclite_open':
> drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c:961: error: implicit declaration of function 'request_irq'
> drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c: In function 'xemaclite_close':
> drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c:995: error: implicit declaration of function 'free_irq'
> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>

This is only relevant for the -next tree, you should specify that when
submitting patches otherwise the maintainer not apply the patch where
it actually belongs.

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/