[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik9kZjJs5H2kvM+xAtd_CR5NA0dDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:38:11 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
Cc: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
anemo@....ocn.ne.jp, Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@...com>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@...com>
Subject: Re: Why move all map_sg/unmap_sg for slave channel to its client?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:54 AM, viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...com> wrote:
> I thought map_sg/unmap_sg for slave channels will be handled according
> to the flags passed in prep_slave_sg(). But then i found following patch:
> (...)
> I don't have much knowledge about that discussion, but i think this should be left
> configurable.
> If the client wants to control map/unmap then it can simply pass
> DMA_COMPL_SKIP_DEST_UNMAP | DMA_COMPL_SKIP_SRC_UNMAP in flags. I didn't wanted to
> skip this in my driver and so i don't pass them.
What if the same driver is used on many different platforms like say
drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c, and some of the platforms using it
has DMA engines that does not implement mapping/unmapping of
the passed sglist?
In that case I think you have to modify all drivers in drivers/dma/*
to do this mapping, and then you could just make it a required behaviour
and skip the flags altogether.
But apparently that approach was blocked at one point so let's see
what the others say.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists