[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110609115934.3c53f78f@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:59:34 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...onical.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
hramrach@...trum.cz, jordipujolp@...il.com, ezk@....cs.sunysb.edu,
mszeredi@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:32:08 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:46:13 +0200
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to ask for overlayfs to be merged into 3.1.
>
> Dumb questions:
>
> I've never really understood the need for fs overlaying. Who wants it?
> What are the use-cases?
https://lwn.net/Articles/324291/
I think the strongest use case is that LIVE-DVD's want it to have a write-able
root filesystem which is stored on the DVD.
>
> This sort of thing could be implemented in userspace and wired up via
> fuse, I assume. Has that been attempted and why is it inadequate?
I think that would be a valid question if the proposal was large and
complex. But overlayfs is really quite small and self-contained.
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists