[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF12BFB.5030102@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:24:27 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, <kumar.gala@...escale.com>,
<benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <greg@...ah.com>, <akpm@...nel.org>,
<cmetcalf@...era.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<linux-console@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] [v4] drivers/virt: introduce Freescale hypervisor
management driver
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The lesson to learn here is obviously not to ship binaries of applications
> to customers before the driver has been merged in a mainline kernel.
Believe me, I know this, but unfortunately I have no control over every aspect
of our development cycle.
> The best way out that I can see is to make the driver carry the proper
> interface in the upstream version, but to have a private patch to support
> both interface versions in the kernel you ship on machines that require
> backwards compatibility. Once you have phased out the user application,
> you can then drop that patch and use the upstream version of the
> interfaces.
I think I can make that work.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists