[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110609203117.GB14235@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:31:17 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, kumar.gala@...escale.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, akpm@...nel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-console@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] [v5] drivers/virt: introduce Freescale hypervisor
management driver
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:18:28PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > More importantly, the code you have chose (0) conflicts with existing drivers
> > (frame buffer, scsi and wavefront among others). Please chose a free one and
> > add it to Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt in the same patch.
>
> Ok, I was really hoping to avoid doing this. Like I said, binary compatibility
> is important, and changing the type will break my existing apps. Are you
> insisting that I pick a new number?
Why is binary compatibility important? Isn't this a brand new driver
for a brand new system? What userspace tools are out there in the wild
for such a thing?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists