linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 13/22] 13: uprobes: Handing int3 and singlestep exception.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:17:54 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 13/22] 13: uprobes: Handing int3 and
 singlestep exception.

> > + */
> > +int uprobe_post_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	struct uprobe *uprobe;
> > +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> > +
> > +	if (!current->mm || !current->utask || !current->utask->active_uprobe)
> > +		/* task is currently not uprobed */
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	utask = current->utask;
> > +	uprobe = utask->active_uprobe;
> > +	if (!uprobe)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> > +	return 1;
> > +}
> 
> Looks like this can be simplified.  If current->utask->active_uprobe is
> non-null then surely the assignment to uprobe will be too?
> 

Yes, the two lines where we check for !uprobe and return are redundant
and can be removed. Will be corrected in the next patchset.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/