[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110610100339.GE22466@vostochny.stro.at>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:03:39 +0000
From: maximilian attems <max@...o.at>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, pefoley2@...izon.net,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] kbuild fixes for 3.0
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:53:34PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com> wrote:
> > Beside that, no matter what, you are about to break
> > `/usr/sbin/sensors-detect' (from my Fedora 14), which rely on a 3
> > digits version number:
>
> Is there really any compelling technical reason to _not_ have Linus
> release the kernels with a superfluous .0 on the end, with the
> understanding that the -stable team gets to increment it for their
> future releases? It'd make every kernel.org release exactly three
> dotted decimals from here on out, which certainly simplifies things.
>
> It seems like we're just borrowing trouble here by trying to drop it
> down to two numbers.
>
> (Not, mind you, that I give a damn at all one way or the other, but it
> feels like you all are going to be spending a lot of time tripping
> over poor assumptions in userspace rather than doing actual work.)
you have forgotten the rule that linus himself is allowed to break userland. :P
in Debian an three digit 3.0.0 release would also be very much appreciated as
dpkg will order wrongly 3.0.0~rcX to 3.0.
--
maks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists