[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110610122451.15af86d1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:24:51 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Johan MOSSBERG <johan.xx.mossberg@...ricsson.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] lib: genalloc: Generic allocator improvements
I am curious about one thing
Why do we need this allocator. Why not use allocate_resource and friends.
The kernel generic resource handler already handles object alignment and
subranges. It just seems to be a surplus allocator that could perhaps be
mostly removed by using the kernel resource allocator we already have ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists