[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1307712622-11104-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:30:21 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched: Make sleeping inside spinlock detection working in !CONFIG_PREEMPT
Select CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT when we enable the sleeping inside
spinlock detection, so that the preempt offset gets correctly
incremented/decremented from preempt_disable()/preempt_enable().
This makes the preempt count eventually working in !CONFIG_PREEMPT
when that debug option is set and thus fixes the detection of explicit
preemption disabled sections under such config. Code that sleeps
in explicitly preempt disabled section can be finally spotted
in non-preemptible kernels.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 28afa4c..a7dd7b5 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -650,6 +650,7 @@ config TRACE_IRQFLAGS
config DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP
bool "Spinlock debugging: sleep-inside-spinlock checking"
+ select PREEMPT_COUNT
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
help
If you say Y here, various routines which may sleep will become very
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists