[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1307675815.1537.9.camel@epip-laptop>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:16:55 +0800
From: Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unicore32: fix build error for find bitops
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:05 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2011/6/9 Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>:
> > 2011/6/9 GuanXuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>:
> >> From: Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
> >>
> >> Remove the __uc32_ prefix in find bitops functions.
> >> see commit <19de85ef574c3a2182e3ccad9581805052f14946>
> >> bitops: add #ifndef for each of find bitops
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
> >> Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/unicore32/include/asm/bitops.h | 6 ------
> >> arch/unicore32/kernel/ksyms.c | 4 ++--
> >> arch/unicore32/lib/findbit.S | 14 ++++++++------
> >> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/bitops.h
> >> index 1628a63..a9653f0 100644
> >> --- a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/bitops.h
> >> +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/bitops.h
> >> @@ -13,12 +13,6 @@
> >> #ifndef __UNICORE_BITOPS_H__
> >> #define __UNICORE_BITOPS_H__
> >>
> >> -#define find_next_bit __uc32_find_next_bit
> >> -#define find_next_zero_bit __uc32_find_next_zero_bit
> >> -
> >> -#define find_first_bit __uc32_find_first_bit
> >> -#define find_first_zero_bit __uc32_find_first_zero_bit
> >> -
> >
> > Is this patch really fix the build error?
> >
> > If these find_*_bit macros are removed, vmlinux will have multiple
> > definisions of find_*_bit. Because lib/find_next_bit.c is built
> > unconditionally after the commit 63e424c84429903c92a0f1e9654c31ccaf6694d0
> > ("arch: remove CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT}".
>
> The attached patch hopefully fix the build error but it is untested
> because I can't find crosstool for unicore32. So could you apply
> this patch on top of your patch and check whether it fixes?
Thanks Akinobu.
I want to avoid the duplication of the 'extern' function definitions in
asm-generic header and arch-specific header.
Guan Xuetao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists