[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201106101736.14850.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:36:14 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
kumar.gala@...escale.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...nel.org, dsaxena@...aro.org, linux-console@...r.kernel.org,
greg@...ah.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] [v4] drivers/virt: introduce Freescale hypervisor management driver
On Friday 10 June 2011, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> This still leaves open the question of what really should go in this new
> directory. Is it just for drivers that manage/control the hypervisor? Or
> is it also for drivers that just use the hypervisor to do I/O of some kind,
> but aren't related to any other "family" of drivers, i.e., a driver that
> would have been dumped in drivers/char or drivers/misc in the old days?
>
> My specific interest at the moment is the proposed tile-srom.c driver
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/843892/), which uses a simple
> hypervisor read/write API to access the portion of the SPI ROM used to hold
> the boot stream for a TILE processor.
I'd still put that driver in drivers/char for now, because it already contains
similar drivers. We can probaby group them in a subdirectory of drivers/char
at some point or move them out to a new directory.
For your raw hcall passthrough driver, that would be something that should
go into drivers/virt/ IMHO.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists