[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF18F03.6040304@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:26:59 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org
CC: dvhart@...ux.intel.com, david@...advisors.com,
kyle@...fetthome.net, luto@....edu, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sbohrer@...advisors.com,
zvonler@...advisors.com, hughd@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Change in functionality of futex() system call.
(2011/06/09 21:05), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 20:37 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> 1) check the pte of the target address is RW attribute.
>> 2-1) if yes, it has no COW chance. we can safely use gup result.
>> 2-2) if no, we have to fallback slow vma walk. maybe, it's okey.
>> both RO mappings and COW are rare situation.
>
> Not so, clean file pages are RO, even if the vma is writable. We use the
> fault to track dirty state with.
Right you are. Sigh. Please forget my previous mail.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists