linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/base/node.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110610183108.GB10575@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:31:08 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/base/node.c)

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:44:05AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:01:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 26 May 2011 16:39:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > [The kernel.org mirroring is being slow today]
> > 
> > 
> > when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled:
> > 
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `node_read_vmstat':
> > node.c:(.text+0x56ffa): undefined reference to `vmstat_text'
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> How do you want this build problem fixed?  (still around in
> linux-next-20110610)

A patch would be great.

But honestly, I really find that CONFIG_PROC_FS disabled to not be a
valid configuration anymore.  I don't know anyone who can successfully
run a machine in that manner, do you?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/