[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106101150280.17197@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mel@....ul.ie,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, riel@...hat.com, pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make GFP_DMA allocations w/o ZONE_DMA emit a warning
instead of failing
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Should one submit a patch adding a warning to GFP_DMA allocations
> > w/o ZONE_DMA, or the idea of the original patch is wrong?
>
> Linus was far from impressed by the original commit, saying:
> | Using GFP_DMA is reasonable in a driver - on platforms where that
> | matters, it should allocate from the DMA zone, on platforms where it
> | doesn't matter it should be a no-op.
>
> So no, not even a warning.
>
Any words of wisdom for users with CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=n that actually use
drivers where they need GFP_DMA? The page allocator should just silently
return memory from anywhere?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists