[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF28274.3000708@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:45:40 +0200
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: maximilian attems <max@...o.at>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>, pefoley2@...izon.net,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] kbuild fixes for 3.0
Dne 10.6.2011 17:22, Linus Torvalds napsal(a):
> - if no such work-arounds can be done without excessive hackery, at
> least make sure that the packages in question know that they are
> broken, so that they get fixed and we can drop the third digit later
> even if we don't drop it at 3.0 itself.
So can we fix the kernel package now, even if the version has to stay at
3.0.0? The depmod hack is probably superfluous, but the rest are either
cleanups or fixes to make a future NUM.NUM release:
kbuild: Fix KERNELVERSION for empty SUBLEVEL or PATCHLEVEL
kbuild: Fix <linux/version.h> for empty SUBLEVEL or PATCHLEVEL
kbuild: Move depmod call to a separate script
perf: Use make kernelversion instead of parsing the Makefile
and this one is a genuine regression fix:
kbuild: silence Nothing to be done for 'all' message
So would pull the branch if I revert "kbuild: Hack for depmod not
handling X.Y versions"?
thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists