linux-kernel - Re: [Cocci] Re: status of constification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:28:29 +0200
From:	Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
CC:	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cocci@...u.dk
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Re: status of constification

> This problem seem to be solved.  At least, I don't see the problem for the
> following semantic patch:
>
> @@
> identifier i,x;
> type T;
> @@
>
> struct i {
>    ...
> - T x;
> + const T x;
>    ...
> };
>
> on the following code:
>
> struct i {
>    int a;
>    int b;
>    /* a comment */
>    int c;
>    int d;
> };
>
> The comment is preserved as well.

Hi,

I've just noticed there is a new version out (1.0.0-rc3), I will give it a try and let you know
the results.

--
Emese

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/