[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF28C7D.7070201@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:28:29 +0200
From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
CC: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cocci@...u.dk
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Re: status of constification
> This problem seem to be solved. At least, I don't see the problem for the
> following semantic patch:
>
> @@
> identifier i,x;
> type T;
> @@
>
> struct i {
> ...
> - T x;
> + const T x;
> ...
> };
>
> on the following code:
>
> struct i {
> int a;
> int b;
> /* a comment */
> int c;
> int d;
> };
>
> The comment is preserved as well.
Hi,
I've just noticed there is a new version out (1.0.0-rc3), I will give it a try and let you know
the results.
--
Emese
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists