[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF2A7D5.1080101@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:25:09 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>,
Jim Bos <jim876@...all.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39.1 immediately reboots/resets on EFI system
On 06/10/2011 04:17 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:03:59AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:58:06PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>>> the problem is : overlapping between kernel code with boot services code.
>>
>> SHouldn't checking against the iomem resource map avoid that?
>>
>>> now e820 table that is passed from bootloader do not include boot services code range. and also current boot/head_64.S will not
>>> try to find usable range for decompressed kernel ( too early )...
>>>
>>> So solution will be:
>>> 1. revert Matthew Garrett's patch, because it breaking unknown good platform.
>>
>> That's acceptable if we can't find a better solution.
>
> If no one objects, I'd like to revert the EFI patch that went into
> 2.6.39.1 that is causing people problems so as to give everyone some
> time to get 3.0 working properly on these boxes.
>
Yes, makes sense at this point.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists