lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:15:04 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <>
Cc:	Srikar Dronamraju <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Steven Rostedt <>,
	Linux-mm <>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Jonathan Corbet <>,
	Hugh Dickins <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Andi Kleen <>,
	Oleg Nesterov <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Jim Keniston <>,
	Roland McGrath <>,
	LKML <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 0/22]  0: Uprobes patchset with perf probe

(2011/06/10 8:03), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 18:28 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>> Please do provide your valuable comments.
> Your patch split-up is complete crap. I'm about to simply fold all of
> them just to be able to read anything.
> The split-up appears to do its best to make it absolutely impossible to
> get a sane overview of things, tons of things are out of order, either
> it relies on future patches filling out things or modifies stuff in
> previous patches.
> Its a complete pain to read..

Maybe for the part of uprobe itself, you are right.
But I hope tracing/perf parts are separated from that.


Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists