linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND]Remove a warning for drivers/edac/i82975x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTi=ATS_ULg2egLZrG9B9NAbq6887Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:42:30 -0700
From:	Connor Hansen <cmdkhh@...il.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arvino55@...il.com
Cc:	ravi@...ztechnologies.com, bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND]Remove a warning for drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c

My system is 64bit, thus not showing a warning

adding cc to maintainer, and dev list

2011/6/9 Harry Wei <jiaweiwei.xiyou@...il.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:37:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:04:13 +0800 Harry Wei wrote:
>>
>> > -   page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
>> > +   page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
>>
>> But page is still unsigned long, not unsigned long long...
> Yup, but if we can define a 'unsigned long long' type?
>>
>> >     if (info->xeap & 1)
>> > -           page |= 0x100000000ul;
>> > +           page |= 0x100000000ull;
>>
>> and just making this second change fixes the warning.
> I will try my best. Can anyone give some other comments?
>>
>> I don't know what the right answer is, but this patch does not look
>> complete to me.
> I will try to give a v2.
>>
>> Back in April there was a discussion about this warning message and the
>> conclusion was that this driver should be replaced.  See
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/21/232 and its replies.
>> But we seem to be having problems reaching the EDAC subsystem maintainer
>> (again cc-ed).
> You have not got a exact conclusion about this warning.
> Maybe Arvind knows more about this warning.(cc'ed)
>
>
> Thanks
> Harry Wei
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


older convo for new cc's

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:04:13 +0800 Harry Wei wrote:

> From: Harry Wei <harryxiyou@...il.com>
>
> When i compile 2.6.39.1, a warning shows like below.
> This patch can fix the warning. And i works well with
> my PC.
>
> [...]
> CC [M]  drivers/edac/e752x_edac.o
> CC [M]  drivers/edac/i82875p_edac.o
> CC [M]  drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.o
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c: In function ���i82975x_process_error_info���:
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too large for ���unsigned long��� type
> CC [M]  drivers/edac/i3000_edac.o
> CC [M]  drivers/edac/i3200_edac.o
> CC [M]  drivers/edac/x38_edac.o
> CC [M]  drivers/edac/i82860_edac.o
> [...]
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Wei <harryxiyou@...il.com>
> Index: prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> ===================================================================
> --- prj.orig/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c      2011-06-04 10:09:55.351174516 +0800
> +++ prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c   2011-06-04 10:10:30.875168437 +0800
> @@ -293,9 +293,9 @@
>               info->errsts = info->errsts2;
>       }
>
> -     page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
> +     page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;

But page is still unsigned long, not unsigned long long...

>       if (info->xeap & 1)
> -             page |= 0x100000000ul;
> +             page |= 0x100000000ull;

and just making this second change fixes the warning.

I don't know what the right answer is, but this patch does not look
complete to me.

Back in April there was a discussion about this warning message and the
conclusion was that this driver should be replaced.  See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/21/232 and its replies.
But we seem to be having problems reaching the EDAC subsystem maintainer
(again cc-ed).


>       chan = page & 1;
>       page >>= 1;
>       offst = page & ((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> --

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
- Show quoted text -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/