[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110611.155802.495936379311916892.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mst@...hat.com
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, yvugenfi@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: introduce VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:28:28 +0300
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:56:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> There's no need for the guest to validate the checksum if it have been
>> validated by host nics. So this patch introduces a new flag -
>> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID which is used to bypass the checksum
>> examing in guest. The backend (tap/macvtap) may set this flag when
>> met skbs with CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY to save cpu utilization.
>>
>> No feature negotiation is needed as old driver just ignore this flag.
>
> This wasn't required by the spec, but maybe it should be.
>
>> Iperf shows 12%-30% performance improvement for UDP traffic. For TCP,
>> when gro is on no difference as it produces skb with partial
>> checksum. But when gro is disabled, 20% or even higher improvement
>> could be measured by netperf.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Applied to net-next-2.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists