[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF389D1.4090909@xaipete.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:29:21 +0200
From: Robert Uhl <ruhl@...pete.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Access to local APIC registers during an interrupt handler
Hi,
I wrote a small interrupt handler (for a 64 bit system) which is
installed by a kernel module in the IDT. My handler just increments a
global variable and then jumps to the original interrupt handler. So
Linux does (hopefully ;-) not notice my handler. With sysfs I can read
the value of these interrupt counter and know exactly how often a
specific interrupt occured.
Of course on a multicore system the interrupts of all cores are counted
together, but I want to separate between the cores. On newer CPUs I can
use the instruction RDTSCP to get the CPU number in ECX, but on older
CPUs it's unsupported.
So I had the idea to use the local APIC ID to check on which core my
handler is executed, even though sometimes local APIC ID != core number,
but the ID should be at least unique.
I get the address of the local APIC ID register at module init with
u64 lapic_idregister = (u64) fix_to_virt(FIX_APIC_BASE) + 0x20;
and use it in my interrupt handler (of course I push/pop all used
registers):
movq (lapic_idregister), %rcx
movq (%rcx), %rcx
But on real hardware the last instruction seems to cause a page fault or
something (SUSE with 2.6.37.6, Fedora with 2.6.38.6), the system simply
reboots. Without this instruction, the handler is executed without any
problems.
And in qemu with vanilla 2.6.37.6 and a buildroot system everything
works fine!
I already had a look with qemu which instructions are executed at a
local APIC timer interrupt (0xEF) until it writes 0x00 to the local APIC
EOI register (same page), but I still can't figure out what's the
problem with my code.
Maybe someone knows what is missing or if there is any other fast way to
figure out on which core the handler is running?
Kind regards,
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists