[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201106121307.20631.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:07:20 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>, metan@....cz,
"Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make GFP_DMA allocations w/o ZONE_DMA emit a warning instead of failing
Hi Pavel,
On Thursday, June 02, 2011, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2011-06-01 21:38:59, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > 2011/6/1 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>:
> > > Please be more polite to other people. After a197b59ae6 all allocations
> > > with GFP_DMA set on nodes without ZONE_DMA fail nearly silently (only
> > > one warning during bootup is emited, no matter how many things fail).
> > > This is a very crude change on behaviour. To be more civil, instead of
> > > failing emit noisy warnings each time smbd. tries to allocate a GFP_DMA
> > > memory on non-ZONE_DMA node.
> > >
> > > This change should be reverted after one or two major releases, but
> > > we should be more accurate rather than hoping for the best.
> >
> > Instaed of, shouldn't we revert a197b59ae6? Some arch don't have
> > DMA_ZONE at all.
> > and a197b59ae6 only care x86 embedded case. If we accept your patch, I
> > can imagine
> > other people will claim warn foold is a bug. ;)
>
> I believe we should revert. It broke zaurus boot for metan...
Is it still a problem, or has it been fixed in the meantime?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists