[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110613101248.GC30962@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:12:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] tracing: Add a free on close control mechanism for
buffer_size_kb
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case TRACE_RINGBUF_FREE_ON_CLOSE: {
> + info->free_buffer_on_close = !!arg;
> + ret = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> }
that doesn't look very tidy.
> @@ -3635,9 +3700,12 @@ static const struct file_operations tracing_pipe_fops = {
> };
>
> static const struct file_operations tracing_entries_fops = {
> - .open = tracing_open_generic,
> + .open = tracing_entries_open,
> .read = tracing_entries_read,
> .write = tracing_entries_write,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = tracing_entries_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = tracing_entries_ioctl,
i don't like it at all that you are adding to the ftrace ABI here.
The *only* premise of the whole /debug/tracing/ muck was to allow it
to be human-parseable and scripted - an ioctl is clearly outside that
scope. Instead of increasing the mess in /debug/tracing/ we want
clean tracing done via the perf ABI ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists