[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1307966043.9218.63.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:54:03 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] tracing: Add a free on close control mechanism
for buffer_size_kb
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/17/366
> >
> > I didn't really like adding another file to the debugfs system, and
> > recommended the ioctl. It seemed like a nice "unix" fit. But if you
> > want to go back to the Vaibhav's original method, which will stay
> > in the frame of "human-parseable and scripted". We could do that.
>
> Yes, i think so - the *only* point of the /debug/tracing/ muck is
> that it's scriptable and human parseable. If Google wants to use it
> for more than that then they should help us enhance the perf syscall
> ABI for tracing ...
Hi Vaibhav,
Sorry for the spin around, but could you resubmit your original patch?
Thanks!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists