[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201106131537.10698.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:37:10 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fb.h: ARM uses __raw_{read/write}
On Monday 13 June 2011 12:08:19 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The change proposed by Hartley wouldn't make much difference from the
> current volatile accesses (__raw_* accessors are implemented as volatile
> on ARM).
I guess it would mainly make a difference if we get a platform where
the PCI bus window is not in the same address space as the regular
physical memory and the accessors actually need to do a computation
on the address. AFAICT, ARM does not currently have any such platform
and I would hope that it says that way.
> I think the memcpy_(from|to)io could be optimised on ARM to only add a
> barrier before or after he copying loop.
Agreed, good idea.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists