[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110613145012.GA1924@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:50:12 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI _OSC support
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:05:38PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> In APEI firmware first mode, hardware error is reported by hardware to
> firmware firstly, then firmware reports the error to Linux in a GHES
> error record via POLL/SCI/IRQ/NMI etc.
>
> This may result in some issues if OS has no full APEI support. So
> some firmware implementation will work in a back-compatible mode by
> default. Where firmware will only notify OS in old-fashion, without
> GHES record. For example, for a fatal hardware error, only NMI is
> signaled, no GHES record.
>
> To gain full APEI power on these machines, a special APEI _OSC needs
> to be evaluated to tell firmware that Linux has full APEI support.
> This patch add the APEI _OSC support.
Using an Intel box I have over at RedHat, I was able to use this patch to
get error injection (EINJ) to provide me a GHES record. Prior to this
patch I would just get unknown NMIs.
Talking with Matthew Garret, I guess it seems that uuids like this are
typical for ACPI.
I can't speak for all the ACPI parts, but the patch looks simple and
corret from my perspective.
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists