lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF63B7A.1030805@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:31:54 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] NOTIFIER: Take over TIF_MCE_NOTIFY and implement
 task return notifier

On 06/13/2011 06:12 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >  The best you can do is IPI everyone as soon as you've caught the #MC,
> >  but you have to be prepared for multiple #MC for the same page. Once
> >  you have that, global synchronization is not so important anymore.
>
> Yeah, in the multiple #MC case the memory_failure() thing should
> probably be made reentrant-safe (if it is not yet). And in that case,
> we'll be starting a worker thread on each CPU that caused an MCE from
> accessing that page. The thread that manages to clear all the mappings
> of our page simply does so while the others should be able to 'see' that
> there's no work to be done anymore (PFN is not mapped in the pagetables
> anymore) and exit without doing anything. Yeah, sounds doable with the
> irq_work_queue ->  user_return_notifier flow.

I don't think a user_return_notifier is needed here.  You don't just 
want to do things before a userspace return, you also want to do them 
soon.  A user return notifier might take a very long time to run, if a 
context switch occurs to a thread that spends a lot of time in the 
kernel (perhaps a realtime thread).

So I think the best choice here is MCE -> irq_work -> realtime kernel 
thread (or work queue)

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ