[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=zTVPkgDO1xXPhypn5Fz6c0PTp79Wq2a6s4jrz3WrJyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:55:40 -0700
From: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPU PM notifiers
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Monday, June 13, 2011, Colin Cross wrote:
>> This patch set tries to address Russell's concerns with platform
>> pm code calling into the driver for every block in the Cortex A9s
>> during idle, hotplug, and suspend. The first patch adds cpu pm
>> notifiers that can be called by platform code, the second uses
>> the notifier to save and restore the GIC state, and the third
>> saves the VFP state.
>>
>> The notifiers are used for two types of events, CPU PM events and
>> CPU complex PM events. CPU PM events are used to save and restore
>> per-cpu context when a single CPU is preparing to enter or has
>> just exited a low power state. For example, the VFP saves the
>> last thread context, and the GIC saves banked CPU registers.
>>
>> CPU complex events are used after all the CPUs in a power domain
>> have been prepared for the low power state. The GIC uses these
>> events to save global register state.
>>
>> Platforms that call the cpu_pm APIs must select
>> CONFIG_ARCH_USES_CPU_PM
>>
>> L2 cache is not covered by this patch set, as the determination
>> of when the L2 is reset and when it is retained is
>> platform-specific, and most of the APIs necessary are already
>> present.
>>
>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 ++
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 212 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/include/asm/cpu_pm.h | 54 +++++++++++
>> arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm/kernel/cpu_pm.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Is there any reason why this has to be ARM-specific? There are other
> architectures where this kind of feature might make sense (SH and
> powerpc at least).
Nothing other than there are currently no adaptations for any drivers
besides ARM, but I can move it somewhere outside ARM. Any suggestions
where?
> Besides, is there any overlap between this feature and the CPU hotplug
> notifiers?
I don't think so - the hotplug notifiers are used when a CPU is being
removed from the system, so no saving and restoring is necessary - the
CPU will be rebooted from scratch. They are used by systems outside
the CPU that need to know that a CPU no longer exists.
CPU PM notifiers are used when a CPU is going through reset in a way
that should be transparent to most of the system. Only drivers within
the CPU itself need a notification. Note that both ARM drivers I
modified did not have a register_cpu_notifier call.
> Rafael
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists