[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110613195613.GA11196@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:56:13 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, trenn@...ell.com,
prarit@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, youquan.song@...el.com,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v4 1/2] stop_machine: enable __stop_machine() to be
called from the cpu online path
* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> Currently stop machine infrastructure can be called only from a cpu that is
> online. But for !CONFIG_SMP, we do allow calling __stop_machine() before the
> cpu is online.
>
> x86 for example requires stop machine infrastructure in the cpu online path
> and currently implements its own stop machine (using stop_one_cpu_nowait())
> for MTRR initialization in the cpu online path.
>
> Enhance the __stop_machine() so that it can be called before the cpu
> is onlined. This will pave the way for code consolidation and address potential
> deadlocks caused by multiple mechanisms of doing system wide rendezvous.
>
> This will also address the behavioral differences of __stop_machine()
> between SMP and UP builds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org # v2.6.35+
> ---
> include/linux/stop_machine.h | 11 +++--
> kernel/stop_machine.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Btw., this is *way* too risky for a -stable backport.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists