linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH trival/tree-wide] Change Ryan Mallon's email address across the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1308006956.26699.52.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:15:56 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andre Renaud <andre@...ewatersys.com>,
	H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	trivial@...nel.org, jj@...osbits.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH trival/tree-wide] Change Ryan Mallon's email address
 across the kernel

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 09:05 +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> On 10/06/11 18:56, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:55:49 +0900
> > Paul Mundt<lethal@...ux-sh.org>  wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:12:50AM +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> >>> I no longer work at Bluewater Systems. Update my email address accordingly.
> >> Is this sort of churn really necessary?
> > Yes - stale email addresses cause all sorts of problems, particularly if
> > in the future the address is re-used in the company. It also causes
> > confusion over who owns and maintains stuff because it's never obvious
> > whether the resolution of an unknown address is
> > A.	'user has moved on, follow the user'
> > B.	'user has moved on, company probably has someone else assigned
> > 	 to it'
> Okay, so there seem to be a number of different opinions on this. I 
> would really like some solution for this so it can go into 3.0. The 
> options I see are:
> a) My original patch
> b) My original patch, but delete email address in .[ch] files rather 
> than change it
> c) Entry in .mailmap (will this work for 3.0?)

It will if Andrew Morton/Linus picks up my patch.

> d) Add MAINTAINERS entries for each of the files which have my email 
> address in them
> e) Some combination of the above

> Is there a preferred option?

My preferred combination is b and c.
If you're European, maybe a and c is best.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/