[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinvXFV1bObeaym6A4VEcxv0jN+zXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:35:30 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: Jay Estabrook <jay.estabrook@...il.com>
Cc: linux-alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>, airlied@...ux.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] alpha, drm: Add Alpha support to Radeon DRM code
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Jay Estabrook <jay.estabrook@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Alpha needs to have the system bus address for the device's local
> memory available, so that it can be returned to user-level, where
> it may be used in an mmap(). So, we make bus.addr hold the ioremap()
> return for kernel use, and then we can modify bus.base appropriately.
>
I don't get this. why is mmap passing in an address? we don't do that anymore.
When you mmap the device node it passes back a hashed offset in the
table, that the
kernel then translates into a proper address and sets up the page tables.
So I really don't get what this patch is doing, either the
explaination of what it is doing is wrong
or it is wrong.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists