[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110613085955.GD27130@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:29:55 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3.0-rc2-tip 2/22] 2: uprobes: Breakground page
replacement.
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2011-06-10 01:03:29]:
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 18:28 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > + vaddr_old = kmap_atomic(old_page, KM_USER0);
> > + vaddr_new = kmap_atomic(new_page, KM_USER1);
> > +
> > + memcpy(vaddr_new, vaddr_old, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + /* poke the new insn in, ASSUMES we don't cross page boundary */
> > + addr = vaddr;
> > + vaddr &= ~PAGE_MASK;
> > + memcpy(vaddr_new + vaddr, &opcode, uprobe_opcode_sz);
> > +
> > + kunmap_atomic(vaddr_new);
> > + kunmap_atomic(vaddr_old);
>
>
> > + vaddr_new = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0);
> > + vaddr &= ~PAGE_MASK;
> > + memcpy(opcode, vaddr_new + vaddr, uprobe_opcode_sz);
> > + kunmap_atomic(vaddr_new);
> >
>
> Both sequences in resp {write,read}_opcode() assume the opcode doesn't
> cross page boundaries but don't in fact have any assertions validating
> this assumption.
>
read_opcode and write_opcode reads/writes just one breakpoint instruction
I had the below note just above the write_opcode definition.
/*
* NOTE:
* Expect the breakpoint instruction to be the smallest size instruction for
* the architecture. If an arch has variable length instruction and the
* breakpoint instruction is not of the smallest length instruction
* supported by that architecture then we need to modify read_opcode /
* write_opcode accordingly. This would never be a problem for archs that
* have fixed length instructions.
*/
Do we have archs which have a breakpoint instruction which isnt of the
smallest instruction size for that arch. If we do have can we change the
write_opcode/read_opcode while we support that architecture?
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists