linux-kernel - Re: rcu: performance regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:14:58 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	"Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: rcu: performance regression

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 06:02 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > This commit also cause hackbench process mode performance dropping, and
> > Shaohua's patch do recovered this. But in hackbench testing, the vmstat
> > show context switch have some reduce. And perf tool show
> > root_domain->cpupri->prio_to_cpu[]->lock has contention with the commit.
> 
> Steven, Peter, would any of the recent fixes address this lock contention? 

No. People occasionally run into that thing, but given the constraints
on SCHED_FIFO SMP (run the n highest priority tasks on m cpus; n<=m)
there isn't really much we can do.

IIRC Chris Mason once proposed a lockless version, but that opened up
race windows, Steve might know the details better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/