[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110614134655.GB13768@localhost>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:46:55 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: trace global_dirty_state
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:33:56PM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 10-06-11 22:48:05, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > [It seems beneficial to queue this simple trace event for
> > next/upstream after the review?]
> >
> > Add trace event balance_dirty_state for showing the global dirty page
> > counts and thresholds at each global_dirty_limits() invocation. This
> > will cover the callers throttle_vm_writeout(), over_bground_thresh()
> > and each balance_dirty_pages() loop.
> OK, this might be useful. But shouldn't we also add similar trace point
> for bdi limits? Otherwise the information is of limited use...
Good point. The bdi limits will be exported in another
balance_dirty_pages trace point.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists