linux-kernel - Re: [slubllv7 04/17] x86: Add support for cmpxchg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:05:15 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, tj@...nel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [slubllv7 04/17] x86: Add support for cmpxchg_double

On 06/14/2011 07:04 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
>>
>> * Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/11/11 8:02 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I don't know - but I definitely need more ACKs to even consider
>>>>> pushing this through slab.git.
>>>>
>>>> Any additional ackers out there?;-)
>>>
>>> Ingo, ping? Could we have this in -tip so I can pull from there?
>>> This is blocking me from queuing SLUB performance improvements to
>>> linux-next.
>>
>> hpa, what's your take on this patch?
> 
> He acked it.
> 

Yep, looks fine now.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/