[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1308071218-5912-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:06:57 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: x86@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] stop_machine: reorganize stop_cpus() implementation
Split __stop_cpus() into stop_cpus_queue() and stop_cpus_locked().
The former handles only the queueing part. The latter uses the queue
function and is functionally equivalent to __stop_cpus().
The reorganization is to help future improvements to stop_machine()
and doesn't introduce any behavior difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
kernel/stop_machine.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 3d3f47d..198973f 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -136,10 +136,11 @@ void stop_one_cpu_nowait(unsigned int cpu, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg,
static DEFINE_MUTEX(stop_cpus_mutex);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, stop_cpus_work);
-int __stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
+static void stop_cpus_queue(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
+ cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg,
+ struct cpu_stop_done *done)
{
struct cpu_stop_work *work;
- struct cpu_stop_done done;
unsigned int cpu;
/* initialize works and done */
@@ -147,9 +148,8 @@ int __stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
work = &per_cpu(stop_cpus_work, cpu);
work->fn = fn;
work->arg = arg;
- work->done = &done;
+ work->done = done;
}
- cpu_stop_init_done(&done, cpumask_weight(cpumask));
/*
* Disable preemption while queueing to avoid getting
@@ -161,7 +161,15 @@ int __stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
cpu_stop_queue_work(&per_cpu(cpu_stopper, cpu),
&per_cpu(stop_cpus_work, cpu));
preempt_enable();
+}
+static int stop_cpus_locked(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
+ cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
+{
+ struct cpu_stop_done done;
+
+ cpu_stop_init_done(&done, cpumask_weight(cpumask));
+ stop_cpus_queue(cpumask, fn, arg, &done);
wait_for_completion(&done.completion);
return done.executed ? done.ret : -ENOENT;
}
@@ -200,7 +208,7 @@ int stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
/* static works are used, process one request at a time */
mutex_lock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
- ret = __stop_cpus(cpumask, fn, arg);
+ ret = stop_cpus_locked(cpumask, fn, arg);
mutex_unlock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
return ret;
}
@@ -230,7 +238,7 @@ int try_stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
/* static works are used, process one request at a time */
if (!mutex_trylock(&stop_cpus_mutex))
return -EAGAIN;
- ret = __stop_cpus(cpumask, fn, arg);
+ ret = stop_cpus_locked(cpumask, fn, arg);
mutex_unlock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists