linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix bogus use of rc = alloc_chrdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:19:08 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rpjday@...shcourse.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix bogus use of rc = alloc_chrdev_region()

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:23:50 Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>
>> > On the topic of drivers/char/{nsc_gpio,pc8736x_gpio,scx200_gpio}, I wonder
>> > if we should move them to drivers/gpio/nsc_gpio despite the fact that they
>> > use a different (older) interface than all the other gpio drivers.
>>
>> I have no problem with moving them into drivers/gpio.  When you do,
>> please rename then drivers/gpio/gpio-*.c
>
> Ok. Should they be in a subdirectory drivers/gpio/nsc_gpio/gpio_* for the
> nonstandard API or do you prefer them to live amongst the regular ones?'

I only see one files per non-standard driver.  I wouldn't bother with
subdirectories.  Just put them in with the general population.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/