linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: include linux/gpio.h where needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:34:20 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft@...ox.ru>,
	x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Harald Welte <laforge@...fiish.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: include linux/gpio.h where needed

Hi Randy,

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:06:02 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> 
> Some files use GPIOF_ macros but don't include the header file
> for them.  These macros are being moved to <linux/gpio.h>, so add
> includes for <linux/gpio.h> where needed.

Shouldn't these patches be in the other order to avoid bisection problems?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped