linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: choose the better clock divider

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTi=1hMNNWeq_4bcCr_ynT8osY3efaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:34:31 +0800
From:	Eric Miao <eric.miao@...aro.org>
To:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Cc:	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Miao <eric.miao@...aro.org>,
	Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: choose the better clock divider

Sorry forgot to include Ben.

Ben, any ideas?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Eric Miao <eric.miao@...aro.org> wrote:
> The original algorithm doesn't perform very well in some cases, e.g.
>
>  When the source clock of the I2C controller is 66MHz, and the
>  requested rate is 100KHz, it gives a divider of 768 instead of
>  the better 640.
>
> Choose a better clock divider so the final clock rate is closer to
> the requested one by comparing the rate distances calculated by
> two adjacent dividers.
>
> Cc: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> index 4c2a62b..cd640ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ static u16 __initdata i2c_clk_div[50][2] = {
>        { 3072, 0x1E }, { 3840, 0x1F }
>  };
>
> +#define I2C_CLK_DIV_NUM                ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_clk_div)
> +
>  struct imx_i2c_struct {
>        struct i2c_adapter      adapter;
>        struct resource         *res;
> @@ -240,22 +242,37 @@ static void i2c_imx_stop(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
>        clk_disable(i2c_imx->clk);
>  }
>
> -static void __init i2c_imx_set_clk(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> -                                                       unsigned int rate)
> +/* find the index into i2c_clk_div[] array, compare with the two
> + * dividers found, return the one with smaller error
> + */
> +static int find_div(unsigned long i2c_clk_rate, unsigned long rate)
>  {
> -       unsigned int i2c_clk_rate;
> -       unsigned int div;
> +       unsigned long div, delta_l, delta_h;
>        int i;
>
> -       /* Divider value calculation */
> -       i2c_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(i2c_imx->clk);
>        div = (i2c_clk_rate + rate - 1) / rate;
> +
>        if (div < i2c_clk_div[0][0])
> -               i = 0;
> -       else if (div > i2c_clk_div[ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_clk_div) - 1][0])
> -               i = ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_clk_div) - 1;
> -       else
> -               for (i = 0; i2c_clk_div[i][0] < div; i++);
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       if (div > i2c_clk_div[I2C_CLK_DIV_NUM - 1][0])
> +               return I2C_CLK_DIV_NUM;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < I2C_CLK_DIV_NUM; i++)
> +               if (i2c_clk_div[i][0] > div)
> +                       break;
> +
> +       delta_h = (i2c_clk_rate / i2c_clk_div[i - 1][0]) - rate;
> +       delta_l = rate - (i2c_clk_rate / i2c_clk_div[i][0]);
> +
> +       return (delta_l < delta_h) ? i : i - 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init i2c_imx_set_clk(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> +                                  unsigned int rate)
> +{
> +       unsigned long i2c_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(i2c_imx->clk);
> +       int i = find_div(i2c_clk_rate, rate);
>
>        /* Store divider value */
>        i2c_imx->ifdr = i2c_clk_div[i][1];
> @@ -271,10 +288,9 @@ static void __init i2c_imx_set_clk(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>
>        /* dev_dbg() can't be used, because adapter is not yet registered */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_BUS
> -       printk(KERN_DEBUG "I2C: <%s> I2C_CLK=%d, REQ DIV=%d\n",
> -               __func__, i2c_clk_rate, div);
> -       printk(KERN_DEBUG "I2C: <%s> IFDR[IC]=0x%x, REAL DIV=%d\n",
> -               __func__, i2c_clk_div[i][1], i2c_clk_div[i][0]);
> +       pr_debug("<%s> I2C_CLK=%ld, REQ RATE=%d, DIV=%d, IFDR[IC]=0x%x\n",
> +               __func__, i2c_clk_rate, rate,
> +               i2c_clk_div[i][0], i2c_clk_div[i][1]);
>  #endif
>  }
>
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/