linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] s3c2410_udc: udc command always disables pull-up instead of passing the command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110615083811.GD31876@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:38:12 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Skacore Systems <skacore.systems@...il.com>
Cc:	balbi@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s3c2410_udc: udc command always disables pull-up instead
 of passing the command

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:30:00AM +0200, Skacore Systems wrote:
> I don't care much about pushing this into mainline. It's a bug and
> it's up to kernel developers to fix that.
> I was aware that kernel devs are bunch of lazy dicks and I'm not going
> to do more work for one line patch.

You are the lazy dick here. All I asked was to follow our standards, do
you have any idea how many patches each kernel maintainer has to go
through ? It doesn't scale if we have to re-format the ugly crap you
send us.

Get over yourself and if you want this fixed, then send a proper patch.

It's just a small set of instructions we are asking you to follow, try
saying the same to your Income Tax office and see if they'll like that
you didn't follow their instructions.

Lazy dicks... hah... the one who can't get a simple set of instructions
right is calling us lazy dicks. What a prick!

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)