[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF872E8.7000604@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:52:56 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] NOTIFIER: Take over TIF_MCE_NOTIFY and implement
task return notifier
On 06/14/2011 07:59 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >I don't think that doing anything to the task is correct, though, as the
> >problem is with the page, not the task itself. In fact if the task is
> >executing a vgather instruction, or if another thread munmap()s the
> >page, it may not hit the same page again when re-executed.
>
> True the memory is the source of the problem - but the task is
> intimately affected. Time for a car analogy :-) ...
>
> You are driving along the road when you notice a giant hole. You
> hit the brakes and stop on the very edge. The problem is with the
> road, not with your car. But I don't think you want to start driving
> again (at least not in the forward direction!)
>
No argument, the current task has to be preempted. But a complete
solution needs to prevent other tasks as well.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists