[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25c1ce98c838621aeb514e6e0e843949.squirrel@webmail.sf-mail.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:00:02 +0200
From: "Rolf Eike Beer" <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "Maxin B John" <maxin.john@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
segooon@...il.com, jkosina@...e.cz, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] devres: Fix possible use after free
> Hello, Maxin.
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:09:34PM +0100, Maxin B John wrote:
>> You are right. I shouldn't have mentioned it as dangerous. I was trying
>> to
>> make this patch description similar to the description present in the
>> previous patch:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/mm-commits/msg84313.html
>>
>> This patch silences the Coverity Prevent's complains about this as
>> use-after-free bug. Please let me know if the updated patch description
>> is OK.
>>
>> "
>> A freed pointer is passed as an argument to the function
>> "devres_destroy()" in
>> "kernel/irq/devres.c" and "lib/devres.c". This patch fixes the possible
>> use
>> after free.
>> The change silences the static analysis tool (Coverity Prevent)
>> complains
>> about this as use-after-free bug.
>> "
>
> Yeap, sounds mostly okay but there's no 'possible use after free'.
> Maybe something like, "devres uses the pointer value as key after it's
> freed, which is safe but triggers spurious use-after-free warnings on
> some static analysis tools. Rearrange code to avoid such warnings".
Sounds good. And please merge both patches together.
Eike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists